Quality·7 min read·By Angel Translation Corp.·Updated Jul 2026

ISO 17100, ISO 18587 and ISO 9001: What Translation Certifications Actually Mean

A plain-English guide to the standards that show up in translation RFPs — what each one certifies, what it does not, and how to read a certification claim.

Key points
  • Three standards, three different promises
  • What each one does — and does not — tell you
  • How to use certifications in a decision
Who this is forProcurement and quality teams evaluating language vendors against certification requirements.

Three standards, three different promises

Certifications appear in almost every language-services RFP, and they are routinely misread as interchangeable proof of "quality". They are not. Each certifies a different thing, and knowing which is which stops you from over- or under-specifying.

ISO 9001 certifies a quality management system — that the organization has documented processes and follows them. ISO 17100 is specific to translation services and covers translator competence, the revision step and project records. ISO 18587 covers the post-editing of machine-translation output. They stack rather than compete.

What each one does — and does not — tell you

ISO 9001 tells you a process exists; it says nothing about whether a translator understands your subject. ISO 17100 requires a separate reviser from the translator and defines competence requirements, which is a meaningful bar — but it does not guarantee domain expertise in your specific field.

ISO 18587 matters as AI drafting becomes standard: it defines what a qualified human post-editor does to machine output. A vendor claiming "AI + human" without reference to a defined post-editing standard is describing an aspiration, not a process.

None of these certify the correctness of any individual translation. They certify that a system is in place. That is valuable as a floor, and useless as a substitute for evaluating domain fit.

How to use certifications in a decision

Treat them as a screen, not a ranking. Require the certifications your regulated content genuinely needs, then evaluate domain expertise, terminology practice and accountability on top — because those are what determine whether your datasheet or submission is actually right.

Ask which certifications apply to the specific service line you are buying, and to which sites. A certification held by one entity does not automatically cover a subcontractor doing your work. Angel Translation operates an ISO 9001:2015 certified quality system, and pairs it with LISA QA 3.1 audits at its expert-led tier — the audit is where a specific translation is actually checked.

Questions

They are not comparable — they certify different things. ISO 9001 covers the management system; ISO 17100 covers the translation process specifically, including a mandatory separate revision step. Many providers hold both.
No. Certifications confirm that defined processes exist and are followed. The correctness of a specific document depends on domain expertise and review, which is why we pair certification with a per-project QA audit rather than treating the certificate as the deliverable.
ISO 18587, which defines qualified human post-editing of machine-translation output. If a vendor offers an AI-assisted workflow, ask how their post-editing step is defined and who performs it.
Not automatically. Confirm the scope of the certificate — which legal entity and which sites it covers — and how work distributed to individual linguists is held to the same standard. This is the same gap worth checking on NDA coverage.

Related reading

QualityLISA QA 3.1 Standard: How Translation Quality Is Actually MeasuredVendorHow to Choose a Translation Vendor in the AI Era: 12 Questions to AskWorkflowThe AI + Expert Hybrid Model: How Angel Translation Combines Both

Have a project that touches this?

Tell us what you are shipping and where. We will tell you which service level it needs — including when it does not need our most expensive one.